Peer Review Policy

OUR PEER REVIEW POLICIES:

JSRT aims to maintain integrity in academic publication, we makes sure that our journal upholds high-quality publications that are advantageous to the broader research community. Hence, we follow double-blind peer-review method for evaluation and review of articles and submissions where authors and reviewers both remain anonymous to one another during the whole review process, experts in the field evaluate submitted manuscripts for significance, originality, and validity to assist editors in deciding whether an article is suitble for our journal.
JSRT abides by the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We make an effort to make peer review fair, impartial, and speedy. The significance, originality, and clarity of the paper, as well as the validity of research article and relevance to the journal's scope, are taken into consideration when deciding whether to accept or reject a manuscript for publication.
To find potential reviewers, we consult a variety of sources, including the editorial board, personal acquaintances etc. We heavily consider reviewer's potential and their field specialisation when assigning articles for review.

OUR PEER REVIEW POLICY CAN BE DEPICTED AS BELOW: