RESEARCH ARTICLE INTELLIGENCE

Articles Published 12 August 2025

Water Quality Classification Using SVM And XGboost Method Machine Learning

AUTHORS & AFFILIATIONS

Naveen Babshette Student, Master of Computer Application, VTU CPGS, Kalaburagi, India
Vijayalaxmi S Asst.Prof, Master of Computer Application, VTU CPGS, Kalaburagi, India

READER ENGAGEMENT

Article metrics

Source-labelled data
173Article / abstract viewsOJS COUNTER usage records
291PDF downloadsOJS COUNTER usage records
14Views · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
14PDF downloads · last 30 daysOJS COUNTER usage records
Readership over time

Recorded months within the last 12 months. Each bar shows recorded access events; the current month is partial.

● Article / abstract views● PDF downloads
Nov 2025
9 views
18 PDF downloads
Dec 2025
5 views
18 PDF downloads
Jan 2026
4 PDF downloads
Feb 2026
2 views
5 PDF downloads
Mar 2026
11 views
6 PDF downloads
Apr 2026
19 views
16 PDF downloads
May 2026
24 views
30 PDF downloads
Jun 2026
11 views
16 PDF downloads
Jul 2026
13 views
45 PDF downloads
Aug 2026
21 views
72 PDF downloads
Sep 2026
26 views
18 PDF downloads
Oct 2026
10 views
8 PDF downloads

Usage totals reflect processed OJS records and may lag recent visits. Citation sources count independently and are not combined.

Keywords:

Water Quality, SVM, XGBoost, Machine Learning

Abstract

Various pollutants have been endangering water quality over the past decades. As a result, predicting and modeling
water quality have become essential to minimizing water pollution. This research has developed a classification
algorithm to predict the water quality classification (WQC). The WQC is classified based on the water quality index
(WQI) from 7 parameters in a dataset using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting
(XGBoost). The results from the proposed model can accurately classify the water quality based on their features.
The research outcome demonstrated that the XGBoost model performed better, with an accuracy of 94%, compared
to the SVM model, with only a 67% accuracy. Even better, the XGBoost resulted in only 6% misclassification error
compared to SVM, which had 33%. On top of that, XGBoost also obtained consistent superior results from 5-fold
validation with an average accuracy of 90%, while SVM with an average accuracy of 64%. Considering the enhanced
performance, XGBoost is concluded to be better at water quality classification.

FULL TEXT

Read the article

DOWNLOAD PAPER

Published

12-08-2025

How to Cite

Naveen Babshette, & Vijayalaxmi S. (2025). Water Quality Classification Using SVM And XGboost Method Machine Learning. Journal of Scientific Research and Technology, 3(8), 51–54. Retrieved from https://jsrtjournal.com/index.php/JSRT/article/view/300
SCHOLARLY DISCOVERY

Follow the research record

Check article metadata and journal source records in their original services.

Clarivate Web of ScienceWeb of ScienceESCI till 2024 · historical verification PDF ↗ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarJournal profile ↗ CrossrefCrossrefDOI records ↗ ResearchGateResearchGateJournal page ↗ ISSN International CentreISSN 2583-8660Official serial record ↗ SciSpaceSciSpaceJournal record ↗ OpenAlexOpenAlexScholarly source record ↗ ScilitScilitJournal source record ↗ Semantic ScholarSemantic ScholarTitle search ↗ Academia.eduAcademia.eduJSRT profile ↗ ROADROADISSN directory record ↗ SJIFactorSJIFactorJournal listing ↗ Cresta MetricsCresta MetricsJournal profile ↗ ZenodoZenodoISSN search ↗ OpenAIREOpenAIRE-connected recordZenodo source record ↗ International Impact Factor ServicesIIFSService reference ↗